Red Colony Home Red Colony Home Introduction Article Index Site Map
 


  - Home
  - Introduction
  - Mission Statement
  - Red Colony Chapters
  - Why Colonize Mars?
  - Mars Organizations
  - Mars Society Info

  Search
  
  Articles   News
   Advanced Search


  Features
  - Control Panel
  - MarsDrive
  - A Future Mars
  - Mars Pic of the Day
  - General Mars Facts
  - Mars Compositions
  - Glossary

  Indexes
  - Article Index
  - Fiction Index
  - Other Papers
  - News Archive
  - Image Archive
  - Author Profiles
  - Site Map

  Categories
  - Colonization
  - Terraforming
  - Biology
  - Chemistry
  - Current Events
  - Engineering
  - Extra-Martian
  - Geology
  - Opinion
  - Sociology
  - Miscellaneous

  Popular Articles
    all articles...
  - Cochrane's Method
  - Focus on Humans
  - Lichen
  - Mars, One Way
  - MarsD2
  - Nuke Propulsion
  - Pathfinder
  - Paying for Mars
  - Space For You
  - To Settle Mars

  Popular Fiction
    all fiction...
  - 2190 RC
  - Boy Droid
  - Colonists
  - Comet 13
  - Counting Stars
  - Dawn of Science
  - Front Door
  - Rise of Mars
  - Teaching Jacob
  - Without a Planet

  Site
  - Link to Us
  - Red Colony Leaders
  - Site History
  - Art & Screenshots
  - Chapter CPanel
  - Site Map

News Archive


 
Search database by:
Text in News Update:

Date:
between and




(List all updates)


Tuesday, February 5, 2002



Nuclear Power Next for NASA?

Nuclear Power.
Nuclear Power.
Credit: Space Nuclear Power and Propulsion Tutorial
(MSNBC) NASA has proposed spending almost a billion dollars over the next five years to develop atomic-powered rockets that could speed spacecraft across the heavens and nuclear reactors to energize outposts on distant planets. In President Bush's 2003 federal budget, released Monday, the space agency proposes to spend about $46.5 million to begin developing nuclear electric rockets and $79 million more to build atomic-powered generators that can fly on spacecraft. Such atomic-driven energy systems, said Ed Weiler, NASA’s associate administrator for science, would eventually free NASA from a dependence on chemical rockets, which are relatively slow and clunky, in the agency’s exploration of distant worlds, such as Jupiter’s moons or the planet Pluto. Right now, NASA spacecraft are launched by a burst of chemical rockets that burn for a few minutes to break away from Earth’s gravity. After that, said Weiler, the spacecraft must drift across deep space toward their target or whip around nearby planets to gain speed, voyages that can take years. The spacecraft, in most cases, are powered by solar cells that convert sunlight to electricity. For distant planets, the sunlight often is so dim that there is little electricity for instruments. He envisions rockets that use nuclear fission or fusion that could fire for months, driving the spacecraft to higher and higher speeds, and then slowing the spacecraft when it approaches its target. Such a technique could possibly halve the time of a 17-year voyage to Pluto, the only solar system planet not yet visited.

(More info: MSNBC.com)


@ 23:03 EST




      Control Panel


  News Topics

   - MRO in orbit
   - Tuner on Mars
   - Nano-Armor
   - New Ion Engine
   - Weak Minerals

  

  Latest Work

   - Turner on Mars
    Jan 28, 2006
   - Terraformation
    Dec 02, 2005
   - Space For You
    Sep 27, 2005
   - MarsD2
    Sep 07, 2005
   - Possibilites
    Aug 29, 2005

  Random Article

   - TPF and SETI
    Sep 05, 2004


  Forum




  Site Statistics


  39 Authors of Works
  97 Submitted Works
  236 Forum Members
  9346 Forum Posts
  9 RC Chapters





Image Archive

Add the MPOD
to your site!



Please support our sponsors

Pages Last Updated March 11, 2006 17:45 ET
Copyright (c) 2022 Red Colony


Visit our Sponsors: